Anketa... :-)

[Nazzgul]

Zarazio si me. Evo ja sam svoj digao sa 1.87Ghz na 2.45Ghz i Ram sa 667Mhz na 700Mhz.

 

Inace ja sam, pored dizanja FSB-a, spustio voltazu CPU-a sa 1.3250V na 1.2700V i dodao ramu jos +0.2V

 

Oseca se razlika, majke mi.. pogotovo na Visti Ultimate - sad mi radi odlicno!! Sto se tice temperature radi cak na manjoj za 2,3 stepena. znaci na nekih 35-36 C. Je li se tebi znatno menjala?!

 

 

Ne znam.... covek nikad zadovoljan, sad razmisljam da stavim FSB na 400 i sa mnoziocem 7x dignem ga na 2.8Ghz :)

Edited April 26, 2007 by Nazzgul

[Baal]

Nije mi se znatno menjala temperatura, evo sad na 3.2 GHz u idle je 34C na oba jezgra, pod orthosom oko 56-57. Naravno da se oseća razlika.

 

Pazi, ako povećavaš FSB na 400 mislim da ćeš morati da povećaš i latency memorije, a možda i napon (vrlo malo). Moj ram (isto NCP na 667 Ghz) radi na 800 GHz, voltaža 2.1v.

 

Testiraj sa orthosom, on je zakon za testiranje stabilnosti procesora nakon overclocka.

[MissionVao]

Jel "skleptani" kad kupim posebne super komponente pa ga sama sastavim?

[necko]

Jel "skleptani" kad kupim posebne super komponente pa ga sama sastavim?

upravo

[Nazzgul]

Radi mi sad CPU-a na 55-56 celzijusa. Ne znam, moze li tako da gura moze i koliko?! Strai AMD mi je radio na 67, al ovo je ipak Intel.

Edited April 30, 2007 by Nazzgul

[APOHAKC]

Wndows

Sklepani IBM

Ne

Manje vise kao i vecina...

[Baal]

Radi mi sad CPU-a na 55-56 celzijusa. Ne znam, moze li tako da gura moze i koliko?! Strai AMD mi je radio na 67, al ovo je ipak Intel.

 

Skini program CoreTemp i vidi kolika ti je temperatura po jezgru u idle i u opterećenju. Za stabilnost tj. opterećenje skini program orthos i pusti ga da radi jedno 2-3 sata.

[Nazzgul]

2-3 sata?! Ja sam ga pustao minut :)

[Baal]

Trebalo bi 2-3 sata da bi se ustanovila stabilnost računara. Zvekneš priority na 9, staviš blend test i odeš negde na 2-3 sata, kada se vratiš vidiš da li ima grešaka.

[Nazzgul]

Probacu..

[mara!]

ili jos bolje - sedis dva tri sata ispred kompa i buljis u monitor!

[voodoo_]

ili još bolje, manje spamujte!

[Nazzgul]

Evo kako mi je radio pod Orthosom:

 

Start Time: 5/3/2007 8:37 AM

 

Duration: 2 hours 10 minutes 25 seconds

 

CPU Speed: 2449MHz

 

Test: Blend - stress CPU and RAM

 

Priority: 5

 

 

Type: Blend - stress CPU and RAM Min: 8 Max: 4096 InPlace: No Mem: 1790 Time: 15

CPU: 2449MHz FSB: 350MHz [349MHz x 7.0 est.]

CPU: 2450MHz FSB: 350MHz [350MHz x 7.0 est.]

5/3/2007 8:37 AM

Launching 2 threads...

Using CPU #0

Beginning a continuous self-test to check your computer.

Press Stop to end this test.

Test 1, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922945 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 2, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922943 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 3, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19374367 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 4, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19174369 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 5, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874369 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 6, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874367 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 7, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18474367 using 1024K FFT length.

Self-test 1024K passed!

Test 1, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 8K FFT length.

Test 2, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M163839 using 8K FFT length.

Test 3, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M159745 using 8K FFT length.

Test 4, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M157695 using 8K FFT length.

Test 5, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M155649 using 8K FFT length.

Test 6, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M153599 using 8K FFT length.

Test 7, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M147455 using 8K FFT length.

Test 8, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M143361 using 8K FFT length.

Self-test 8K passed!

Test 1, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M212991 using 10K FFT length.

Test 2, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M210415 using 10K FFT length.

Test 3, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M208897 using 10K FFT length.

Test 4, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M204799 using 10K FFT length.

Test 5, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M200705 using 10K FFT length.

Test 6, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M196607 using 10K FFT length.

Test 7, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M194561 using 10K FFT length.

Test 8, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M188415 using 10K FFT length.

Test 9, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M186369 using 10K FFT length.

Self-test 10K passed!

Test 1, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432577 using 896K FFT length.

Test 2, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432575 using 896K FFT length.

Test 3, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17115073 using 896K FFT length.

Test 4, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16815071 using 896K FFT length.

Test 5, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16515073 using 896K FFT length.

Test 6, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16515071 using 896K FFT length.

Test 7, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16297569 using 896K FFT length.

Self-test 896K passed!

Test 1, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942209 using 768K FFT length.

Test 2, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942207 using 768K FFT length.

Test 3, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155777 using 768K FFT length.

Test 4, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155775 using 768K FFT length.

Test 5, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13969343 using 768K FFT length.

Test 6, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13669345 using 768K FFT length.

Test 7, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13369345 using 768K FFT length.

Self-test 768K passed!

Test 1, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M250519 using 12K FFT length.

Test 2, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245759 using 12K FFT length.

Test 3, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245281 using 12K FFT length.

Test 4, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M243713 using 12K FFT length.

Test 5, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M235519 using 12K FFT length.

Test 6, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M233473 using 12K FFT length.

Test 7, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M231183 using 12K FFT length.

Test 8, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M229375 using 12K FFT length.

Test 9, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M225281 using 12K FFT length.

Self-test 12K passed!

Test 1, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M291913 using 14K FFT length.

Test 2, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M286719 using 14K FFT length.

Test 3, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M282625 using 14K FFT length.

Test 4, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M280335 using 14K FFT length.

Test 5, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M278527 using 14K FFT length.

Test 6, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M274335 using 14K FFT length.

Test 7, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M270335 using 14K FFT length.

Test 8, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M266241 using 14K FFT length.

Test 9, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M262143 using 14K FFT length.

Self-test 14K passed!

Test 1, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12451841 using 640K FFT length.

Test 2, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12451839 using 640K FFT length.

Test 3, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12196481 using 640K FFT length.

Test 4, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11796481 using 640K FFT length.

Test 5, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11796479 using 640K FFT length.

Test 6, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11596479 using 640K FFT length.

Test 7, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11285761 using 640K FFT length.

Torture Test ran 2 hours, 10 minutes 25 seconds - 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Execution halted.

 

 

Using CPU #1

Beginning a continuous self-test to check your computer.

Press Stop to end this test.

Test 1, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922945 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 2, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19922943 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 3, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19374367 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 4, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M19174369 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 5, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874369 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 6, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18874367 using 1024K FFT length.

Test 7, 4000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M18474367 using 1024K FFT length.

Self-test 1024K passed!

Test 1, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M172031 using 8K FFT length.

Test 2, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M163839 using 8K FFT length.

Test 3, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M159745 using 8K FFT length.

Test 4, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M157695 using 8K FFT length.

Test 5, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M155649 using 8K FFT length.

Test 6, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M153599 using 8K FFT length.

Test 7, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M147455 using 8K FFT length.

Test 8, 800000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M143361 using 8K FFT length.

Self-test 8K passed!

Test 1, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M212991 using 10K FFT length.

Test 2, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M210415 using 10K FFT length.

Test 3, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M208897 using 10K FFT length.

Test 4, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M204799 using 10K FFT length.

Test 5, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M200705 using 10K FFT length.

Test 6, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M196607 using 10K FFT length.

Test 7, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M194561 using 10K FFT length.

Test 8, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M188415 using 10K FFT length.

Test 9, 560000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M186369 using 10K FFT length.

Self-test 10K passed!

Test 1, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432577 using 896K FFT length.

Test 2, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17432575 using 896K FFT length.

Test 3, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M17115073 using 896K FFT length.

Test 4, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16815071 using 896K FFT length.

Test 5, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16515073 using 896K FFT length.

Test 6, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16515071 using 896K FFT length.

Test 7, 4500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M16297569 using 896K FFT length.

Self-test 896K passed!

Test 1, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942209 using 768K FFT length.

Test 2, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14942207 using 768K FFT length.

Test 3, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155777 using 768K FFT length.

Test 4, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M14155775 using 768K FFT length.

Test 5, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13969343 using 768K FFT length.

Test 6, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13669345 using 768K FFT length.

Test 7, 5300 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M13369345 using 768K FFT length.

Self-test 768K passed!

Test 1, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M250519 using 12K FFT length.

Test 2, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245759 using 12K FFT length.

Test 3, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M245281 using 12K FFT length.

Test 4, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M243713 using 12K FFT length.

Test 5, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M235519 using 12K FFT length.

Test 6, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M233473 using 12K FFT length.

Test 7, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M231183 using 12K FFT length.

Test 8, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M229375 using 12K FFT length.

Test 9, 460000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M225281 using 12K FFT length.

Self-test 12K passed!

Test 1, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M291913 using 14K FFT length.

Test 2, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M286719 using 14K FFT length.

Test 3, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M282625 using 14K FFT length.

Test 4, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M280335 using 14K FFT length.

Test 5, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M278527 using 14K FFT length.

Test 6, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M274335 using 14K FFT length.

Test 7, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M270335 using 14K FFT length.

Test 8, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M266241 using 14K FFT length.

Test 9, 380000 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M262143 using 14K FFT length.

Self-test 14K passed!

Test 1, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12451841 using 640K FFT length.

Test 2, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12451839 using 640K FFT length.

Test 3, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M12196481 using 640K FFT length.

Test 4, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11796481 using 640K FFT length.

Test 5, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11796479 using 640K FFT length.

Test 6, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11596479 using 640K FFT length.

Test 7, 6500 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M11285761 using 640K FFT length.

Self-test 640K passed!

Test 1, 7800 Lucas-Lehmer iterations of M9961473 using 512K FFT length.

Torture Test ran 2 hours, 10 minutes 25 seconds - 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Execution halted.

 

Sistem je stabilan!! :)

 

Temperatura mi je:

 

Core #0 64 C

Core #1 63 C

 

 

Dok je radio Orthos temperatura je varirala u Core #0 i Core #1 od nekih 71 C do 77C.

 

What ya think?!

Edited May 3, 2007 by Nazzgul

[Baal]

Ja ne bih išao preko 75 C u orthosu za svaki dan.. Inače, izgleda da je stabilno sve, možda bi mogao da ubaciš jednu 12icu da izvlači topao vazduh sa procesora ili jednu osmicu da ubacuje vazduh.

[mara!]

e, a je l' to sto radite legalno, lol?

[Axeanosilas]

e, a je l' to sto radite legalno, lol?

 

Није. За ово се у Индонезији и на Зеленортским острвима иде у затвор. У осталим државама углавном добијеш услов. Ово је Србија па људи свашта раде. Нема закона, моја Марија.

[Baal]

Overklokeri se kažnjavaju vešanjem.

[mara!]

Znam da nije legalno, zato i kazem

Lol, a sta bi sa lomacama?

[necko]

ne ne, vesaju ih gole na sred glavnog gradskog trga :):)

[R_a_S_a]

Ispravite me ako gresim ali mislim da ce core 2 duo biti isplativ do kraja godine-ono best buy fazon.

Jednojezgarni idu u zasluzenu penziju.Slava im!

[voodoo_]

Dvojezgarni procesori su i sad isplativi. Athlon X2 košta stotinak i manje evra a odličan je takođe.

[Demonic_Alliance]

E da, nek meni neobrazovanom tj pomalo zardjalom glede hardvera (tek sam pre par dana ukapirao da athlon64 ploce koriste DDR2 a ne DDR...) neko objasni razliku izmedju "obicnih" P4 dual core i ovih sto imaju naziv core2duo ?

Mislim, svi su dual core, u cemu je (Bora Spuzic) kvaka?

 

E to i koji su od p4-ki 64bitni a koji nisu (po socketu ili kako vec...)?

 

Verovatno bih ovo lako mogao da iskopam po netu ali nije mi "o glavu" pa me mrzi, pa eto da pitam kad sam vec tu.

 

btw koliko vidim Intelovi dual core sad kostaju samo malo iznad AMD-ovih, dok su ploche tu negde.

 

Da li se isplati vishe uzeti AMD ili za kojih 20-ak evra vishe ekvivalentni intel?

[imaginos]

vidim po anketi da neki ljudi imaju laptopove, pa bih zamolio da napisu nesto o konkretnim modelima koje imaju: tip, dobre strane, lose strane, komentar, na sta treba obratiti paznju prilikom kupovine, i slicno...

 

hvala!

[Baal]

Dvojezgarni procesori su i sad isplativi. Athlon X2 košta stotinak i manje evra a odličan je takođe.

 

 

Core2Duo E4300 sa množiocem 9x za FSB je sad oko 120e, a E4400 (množilac 10x) 140e. Overklokuju se strašno dobro sa minimalnim povećanjem temperature. AMD trenutno puno zaostaje za Intelom (po preformansama) od kada su izbacili Core2Duo.

[Kokopelli]

vidim po anketi da neki ljudi imaju laptopove, pa bih zamolio da napisu nesto o konkretnim modelima koje imaju: tip, dobre strane, lose strane, komentar, na sta treba obratiti paznju prilikom kupovine, i slicno...

 

hvala!

Ja sam u'vatila cynic-a jedan dan. On me pitao za šta mi je lap potreban. Tako je i sklepao konfiguraciju. Kupila ga i sada mi je super! Moj je HP-ov. To je sve što znam E da, i imam mogućnost da umjesto šifre otključavam komp. pomoću otiska prsta, tzv. fingerprint Pitali su me hoću li Vistu, ali me ona ne zanima. Dobila sam i fenomenalnu torbu. Pošto sam prilično smotana, ako mi padne, ništa se ne dešava, jer ima nekakve silikonske stvarčice... Nisam još probala da li radi