Jump to content

'bem ti život


ManiaC

Recommended Posts

Da se umesto Trampa nasao Berni, bez problema bi oduvao Hilari, bila bi to cista pobeda Republikanaca, steta je sto je Berni morao da interno posustane zbog Klintonke i ekipe.

 

Berni kao kandidat republikanaca, ne zezaj :haha:

 

u svakom odgovoru je navodio da će stvoriti "tremendous jobs", da Kinezi i Meksikanci prave probleme itd.

 

Trampova kampanja in a nutshell, tako je i dosao dovde :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meni su bili 50/50.

Nadao sam se da će da je Tramp oduva u ovom prvom (i najvažnijem) duelu.

 

Trebao je da je ponižava malo na ličnom nivou, da pokaže (i pronađe) stvari koje ona ne zna, a opšte su.... ili... Odgovorite mi sa da ili ne, Hilari. Da li vaši glasači znaju da ste zla spodoba?

Uostalom, trebao je da pogleda neke duele Šelkija iz devedesetih, da se priuči malo kako se to radi.

 

Obama je moralna, intelktualna i svaka druga gromada za to dvoje pacera

 

Taj ne zna gde mu je dupe, i glava.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On kaže da Amerika izdvaja ogromna sredstva za finansiranje NATO zemalja, Saudijske Arabije, Japana itd.

 

Rekao je da Amerika brani te zemlje i da ona jedina ulaze u vojsku, nesto tipa 75% ukupnog NATO budzeta. Sad kontas od koga kurca oni brane Japan i Nemacku? ... i ostale. Oni su sa tim terorizmom toliko napumpali ljude u Americi da ovi stvarno misle da ce teroristi svaki cas da se domognu nuklearnog oruzja. A cak i da se domognu opet su najvise krivi sami, jer je jasno da ovaj ISIS ne bi ni nastao da nisu srusili ove, nazovi, diktatore.

 

Pored toga,svi znaju da ovi Saudijci trose milijarde svake godine kupujuci njihovo oruzje, a gorivo je u Americi uvek bilo jeftinije nego u Evropi, i to poprilicno. Mislim da sad nije bas toliko, ali secam se da mi je drug pricao, pre desetak godina, da je bilo otprilike triput jeftinije nego kod nas. Kurac moj bi ulagali tolike pare u vojsku da im se ne isplati. Cini mi se da im je za ovu godinu vojni budzet bio nekih 800 milijardi. Leb ti jebem pa 90% zemalja nemaju toliki GDP. Nas je nekih 30 mlrd. u vr' glave. Samo to pogledas i vidis koliko je sve otislo u kurac.

 

U svakom slucaju isti djoka ko god bude, ne samo izmedju ovo dvoje vec i bilo ko drugi da dodje. Ko uopste veruje da ce nesto bitno da se promeni u njihovoj spoljnoj politici. Jos smesnije je kad kazu da je Obama smanjio intervencije, a u stvari on je prvi odobrio napade dronovima, u kojima je ubijeno boga pitaj koliko civila, tamo negde po Pakistanu, i slicnim vukojebinama. Pored toga napao je i Libiju, a napao bi i Siriju da Rusi nisu uleteli.

Edited by LoveHateLove
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@darkelf

 

malo sutra ne zna. samo sto ljudi ne mogu da provale njegov politicki karakter i smisao bivanja predsednikom nego se vode povrsnim neuspesima.

obama je agent korporacija "poslat" da zastiti ameriku, odnosno njih, od dela politicke elite koji je gone rogue. da zaustavi orgijanje geronto-reganita, teskih dekadenata, koji su u produzenoj post-hladnoratovskoj euforiji umislili da su bukvalno gospodari sveta. prvo su na vlast dosli samo zbog klintonovog skandala i to sa upitnim legitimitetom, a onda su pustili konce iz ruku i doveli zemlju u tesku depresiju, ekonomsku i moralnu (also not good for business).

znaci trebao im je jedan disciplinovan dzentlmen koji ce da morati da drzi konce i ocuva privid kontinuiteta u sistemu potonulom u iracionalnost, neko ko ce da pocisti sektu, a da ne izazove revolt, ko ce svojom harizmom (kultom licnosti, konkretno u slucaju obame) predupredi ili makar odgodi predstojece nerede tipa occupy wall street, ko ce da obezbedi da demokratska partija ostane stabilna korporatisticka opcija za ubuduce, umesto da skrene u neki boz'me sacuvaj socijalizam, a bome i neko ko ce ostati prihvatljiv nabreklom vojnoidustrijskom kompleksu, ukratko neko sa veoma preciznim zadatkom...i to je bio dobar izbor, sasvim dobar.

obamacare nije bio deo tog zadatka, to je nebitan detalj, nesto sprckano i sprovedeno da se formalno ima "legacy". a ttip je samo bonus, ono aj da probamo i ovo sranje da proturimo. to su ti povrsni neuspesi recimo. a "dubinski" uspeh je popravljanje americke ekonomije i genijalno bogacenje ekonomske elite.

 

da ne zna gde mu je dupe a gde glava kao sto bus ne zna, da se nastavilo to ludilo, svet bi danas drugacije izgledao, mnogo drugacije i mnogo, mnogo gore.

 

President Barack Obama firmly resists ideological labels, but at the end of a private meeting with a group of moderate Democrats on Tuesday afternoon, he offered a statement of solidarity.

“I am a New Democrat,” he told the New Democrat Coalition, according to two sources at the White House session.

 

 

The group is comprised of centrist Democratic members of the House, who support free trade and a muscular foreign policy but are more moderate than the conservative Blue Dog Coalition.

Obama made his comment in discussing his budget priorities and broader goals, also calling himself a “pro-growth Democrat” during the course of conversation.

The self-descriptions are striking given Obama’s usual caution in being identified with any wing of his often-fractious party. He largely avoided the Democratic Leadership Council — the centrist group that Bill Clinton once led — and, with an eye on his national political standing, has always shied away from the liberal label, too.

As recently as last week, he steadfastly refused to define his governing philosophy.

Asked in an interview with The New York Times to describe if he was a liberal, socialist or progressive, Obama demurred.

“No, I’m not going to engage in that,” he said, before calling back the reporters later in the day to question why they would even ask if he is a socialist.

 

Edited by Berliner
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.

 

bog.

Edited by Berliner
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Čitam danas vest o ovom karikaturisti što su ga izbacili iz Politike, nije da pratim situaciju, ali me dosta začudilo što je RTS objavio bilo kakvu vest u kojoj piše nešto tipa 'rekli su mi da pravim manje karikatura sa Vučićem kao glavnim likom i zato sam dobio otkaz', ali onda pogledam komentare, ono je gomila ljudi koja je popljuvala čoveka jer je to izjavio. Jesu botovi stvarno toliko aktivni ili ljudi stvarno toliko svršavaju na našeg sveprisutnog vođu? Or both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...